Since we're being all high-level, it'd be good for a random function which allows us to specify the range of numbers, since % doesn't promise an even spread of probabilities (especially for large ranges). --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
- DISCUSS: replace (rand) Stuart Halloway
- Re: DISCUSS: replace (rand) Paul Barry
- Re: DISCUSS: replace (rand) bOR_
- Re: DISCUSS: replace (rand) Robert Feldt
- Re: DISCUSS: replace (rand) Stuart Halloway
- Re: DISCUSS: replace (rand) Michael Wood
- Re: DISCUSS: replace (rand) Stuart Halloway
- Re: DISCUSS: replace (rand) Mark H.
- Re: DISCUSS: replace (rand) Konrad Hinsen
- Re: DISCUSS: replace (rand) Mark H.
- Re: DISCUSS: replace (rand) don.aman
- Re: DISCUSS: replace (rand) Kyle Schaffrick
- Re: DISCUSS: replace (rand) bOR_
- Re: DISCUSS: replace (rand) Mark H.
- Re: DISCUSS: replace (rand) Mark H.
- Re: DISCUSS: replace (rand) Mark H.
- Re: DISCUSS: replace (rand) Randall R Schulz
- Re: DISCUSS: replace (rand) Mark H.
- Re: DISCUSS: replace (rand) Konrad Hinsen
- Re: DISCUSS: replace (rand) Mark H.
- Re: DISCUSS: replace (rand) Konrad Hinsen