Hi,

Am 30.11.2008 um 10:00 schrieb puzzler:
Is there a way to write concatvec in an O(1) way, taking advantage of
sharing?
I suspect that the "obvious way" to concatenate vectors, i.e., (into
[] (concat v1 v2)), would be O(n).


You may want to use the reduce with conj.

(reduce conj v1 v2)

This is O(count v2).

Sincerely
Meikel



Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to