subvec is O(1) because it takes advantage of sharing. This is quite useful.
Is there a way to write concatvec in an O(1) way, taking advantage of sharing? I suspect that the "obvious way" to concatenate vectors, i.e., (into [] (concat v1 v2)), would be O(n). --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
