On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 1:00 PM, dreish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My favorite thing about recur is that the compiler tells you
> immediately if you accidentally put it somewhere other than in a tail
> position. You don't have to wait for the stack to overflow in actual
> use because your test case was too small. I would hope the keyword
> sticks around even if TCO gets added to the JVM.
Hear, hear! +1 Can I only vote once? +10
:-)
Hm, maybe a general compile-time assert would be in order, once we
have real tail-call optimization, so that even in the mutual-recursion
case you could get a nice error if you make a mistake like:
(def foo []
(+ 10
(tail-call bar 1 2)))
Although something less ugly might be nice.
--Chouser
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
