Yes, this is superb—I was just now trying to figure out a complicated
tree zipper that mutual recursion would make needless. Thanks a lot!

On Nov 25, 11:22 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Nov 25, 11:07 am, Rich Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Nov 25, 10:42 am, "Stephen C. Gilardi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > On Nov 25, 2008, at 9:05 AM, Rich Hickey wrote:
>
> > > > I've added trampoline to ease the conversion/creation of mutually
> > > > recursive algorithms in Clojure.
>
> > > Very cool! Thanks for enabling that.
>
> > > In looking over the implementation, I found a small problem: the arg
> > > vector precedes the doc string leading to:
>
> > Fixed (SVN 1123) - thanks for the report.
>
> > I've also added support for passing initial args, so the top-level
> > call can be:
>
> > (trampoline foo 1000000)
>
> I think this will be very useful. Now if only we can convince Sun to
> make it unnecessary...
>
> -- Steve
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to