Thanks to everyone who answered. The custom macro seems to be the way to go for a local method. I'm no good at macros, though, so I suppose I have to confront them and figure them out now. :)
On Nov 19, 5:20 am, Stuart Halloway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You could write a with-method macro that adds a method to a > multifunction, and then removes it at the end of the test. It would be > dynamically scoped, but that should be good enough for test setup/ > teardown. > > Stuart > > > > > I'm trying to unit-test a library with which a user can define methods > > on the library's multi-function to change its behavior. So I need to > > be able to define lexically-scoped methods in each test. Is it > > possible to use let to create a lexically-scoped method? > > > The problems I'm encountering are that, unlike for functions, there > > doesn't seem to be a special-form for creating methods, and that even > > if it could be defined it'd go in the current namespace instead of the > > library's namespace. But does anyone know how I can test this anyway? > > > Thanks in advance! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
