You could write a with-method macro that adds a method to a multifunction, and then removes it at the end of the test. It would be dynamically scoped, but that should be good enough for test setup/ teardown.
Stuart > > I'm trying to unit-test a library with which a user can define methods > on the library's multi-function to change its behavior. So I need to > be able to define lexically-scoped methods in each test. Is it > possible to use let to create a lexically-scoped method? > > The problems I'm encountering are that, unlike for functions, there > doesn't seem to be a special-form for creating methods, and that even > if it could be defined it'd go in the current namespace instead of the > library's namespace. But does anyone know how I can test this anyway? > > Thanks in advance! > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
