On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:17 AM, Raffael Cavallaro <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
>
>
> On Nov 17, 11:55 pm, "Cosmin Stejerean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Most of these projects change on a daily basis and so far I've never run
> > into any issues using the latest version of each. During initial
> > installation the chances of issues being due to user error are far
> greater
> > than problems due to incompatible versions, and since getting in the
> habit
> > of using the latest version (and updating regularly) is a good thing, I
> > would recommend using the latest version to any newcomer and posting
> > questions here including detailed explanation of what was tried and what
> > happened.
>
>
> Allow me to repeat that I was using the latest git cloned and cvs co'd
> versions of all these components , a *completely blank* .emacs, and a
> freshly installed Aquamacs. IOW, a pristine, completely up to date
> install. Just because it worked on the day you did your setup most
> definitely does *not* mean this is a reliable procedure.
>

If you had provided the specific versions you checked out and your resulting
.emacs file we could have a conversation about whether or not the problem
was due to versions constantly changing or some misconfiguration on your
part.

Building from latest head is not 100% reliable, but I'm not yet convinced
it's worth optimizing for the rare chance that there is an incompatibility.
Even if you were to provide a link to some known good version of each
project, how do you define "good"? What kind of bugs are acceptable for the
purpose of a known good combination? Is slime starting up sufficient?

Assuming some automated tests can be created to define the characteristics
of a known good combination I'll volunteer to create a continuous
integration server to report the status of trying to use the latest version
of each project so interested users can quickly see if the most recent
combination works, and if not look, at the history to find the most recent
one that does. Is providing automated tests something you'd like to help
with?

-- 
Cosmin Stejerean
http://www.offbytwo.com

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to