On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 11:55 AM, R. P. Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Very clear explanation - I guess I thought that it would be possible > to to do the equivalent of (constantly 3) using the macro. I was just > overlooking the arity issue with the reduce call.
It's possible, but ugly. #(do [%&] 3) Please don't use that. :-) --Chouser --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
