On Oct 16, 2008, at 11:18 PM, Luc Prefontaine wrote:
> Looking at classForName in the RT.java module (in trunk, checked out
> a few days ago):
>
> static public Class classForName(String name) throws
> ClassNotFoundException{
>
> return Class.forName(name, false, baseLoader());
> }
>
> false means do not initialize the class.
> It's faster to avoid the class initialization and it's probably the
> proper thing to do 98% of the time.
> Make that patch "permanent" in contrib/sql :)). A change in the
> actual implementation
> would surprise me, too many performance impacts and possible
> behaviour problems may rise from a change.
Thanks for the explanation. I'm happy to use Class/forName
permanently. I had changed to RT/classForName because of a prior
discussion with Rich about a desire for RT's class loading facilities
to be the ones we use from Clojure code.
Rich, would it be a good idea to expose the "initialize" boolean in an
additional version of RT/classForName?
--Steve
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
