Frans, Can you please create a ticket on https://github.com/Cisco-Talos/clamav/issues for the clamd test failure? Please attach the verbose output from running: ctest -V
Regarding make -j [n] vs ninja -- yes it's not a huge difference. It's just a convenience if you're compiling a lot. We should probably remove the ninja suggestion from the INSTALL.md file. I didn't include it in https://docs.clamav.net/manual/Installing/Installing-from-source-Unix.html We do mention it here, which is good enough: https://docs.clamav.net/manual/Development/development-builds.html -Micah > -----Original Message----- > From: clamav-users <clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net> On Behalf Of > Frans de Boer > Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2021 11:08 AM > To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net > Subject: Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV® blog: ClamAV 0.104.0 Release Candidate > is here! > > I get things compiled etc., but testing clamd keeps on failing. I tried three > different machines/CPU's to no avail. > > I use OpenSUSE Tumbleweed with newest cmake etc. > > One remark: using 'make -j [n]' instead of ninja only takes less than 2 > seconds > longer to build things. So, the 'big speed up' is only a 'very minor speed > up'. Of > course if you compile a very large amount of software every day, multiple > times > a day, those less than 2 seconds do add up. > > Any suggestion what data I can provide to find the cause of the failure? > > Regards, Frans. > > _______________________________________________ > > clamav-users mailing list > clamav-users@lists.clamav.net > https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users > > > Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: > https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq > > http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml _______________________________________________ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.clamav.net https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
