On 13.03.21 12:47, Joel Esler (jesler) via clamav-users wrote:
The qnap and synology issues are a result of the EOL of <0.100. Not as a result of the abusive downloaders. Two separate issues.
are freshclam versions <0.100 blocked? Because they seem to support cdiffs. I understand the rest. Just wanted to note that QNAP does use freshclam - I misunderstood Paul Smith's comment about their mirror. They do not provide mirror, because their devices with obsolete ClamAV aren't supported.
It is becoming more and more necessary to enforce these cut off points because of many reasons. Load to the mirror network being one. So, .100, and .101 will continue to be supported for a bit, but soon, we’re going to have to cut those off too.
Do those versions cause some additional problems for your mirrors? -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. I feel like I'm diagonally parked in a parallel universe. _______________________________________________ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.clamav.net https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
