Cheers Steve, In the interest of completeness, here's the scan from today (TXT from DNS: 0.101.1:58:25399:1553509741:1:63:48528:328) showing a marked improvement in scan time, although at 6m 7s it's still almost twice what it used to be.
Mark On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 12:56, Steve Basford <steveb_cla...@sanesecurity.com> wrote: > On 2019-03-25 10:52, Mark Allan via clamav-users wrote: > > Hi all, > > > te. > > > > Hopefully this helps someone to narrow things down a bit. > > > > Mark > > > > 18/3/19 10m 49s TXT from DNS: > 0.101.1:58:25392:1552904941:1:63:48507:328 *** > > Here's the changes for the above update: > > https://lists.gt.net/clamav/virusdb/75154 > > You can also check sigs quickly per update: > > https://lists.gt.net/clamav/virusdb/ > > > > -- > Cheers, > > Steve > Twitter: @sanesecurity > > _______________________________________________ > > clamav-users mailing list > clamav-users@lists.clamav.net > https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users > > > Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: > https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq > > http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml >
_______________________________________________ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.clamav.net https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
