Reference? First I'm hearing of any such thing.

-Al-

> On Mar 23, 2019, at 02:26, Jean-Michel via clamav-users 
> <clamav-users@lists.clamav.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> Micah Snyder, Do you know if Clamav was able to trace the orgine of getting 
> crawled in the database "daily.cld" and was able to fix the problem?
> Regards
>  
> De : Micah Snyder (micasnyd) <micas...@cisco.com <mailto:micas...@cisco.com>> 
> Envoyé : lundi 18 mars 2019 18:09
> À : ClamAV users ML <clamav-users@lists.clamav.net 
> <mailto:clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>>
> Objet : Re: [clamav-users] Scan very slow
>  
> Maarten,
>  
> This is very concerning, and the details you’ve provide are quite helpful.  
> Thank you for investigating.
> Hopefully we can figure out why the newer daily.cld/cvd is scanning 
> significantly slower than before. Any other details you can provide would 
> probably be helpful.  If you’re aware if any specific file types are causing 
> the issue, or if all files appear to scanning slower that will also help.
>  
> -Micah
>  
> 
> Micah Snyder
> ClamAV Development
> Talos
> Cisco Systems, Inc.
>  
>  
>  
> From: clamav-users <clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net 
> <mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net>> on behalf of Maarten Broekman 
> via clamav-users <clamav-users@lists.clamav.net 
> <mailto:clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>>
> Reply-To: ClamAV users ML <clamav-users@lists.clamav.net 
> <mailto:clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>>
> Date: Monday, March 18, 2019 at 10:37 AM
> To: ClamAV users ML <clamav-users@lists.clamav.net 
> <mailto:clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>>
> Cc: Maarten Broekman <maarten.broek...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:maarten.broek...@gmail.com>>
> Subject: Re: [clamav-users] Scan very slow
>  
> We've noticed a marked increase in scan times over the last couple of weeks 
> as well. From the look of it, there's something in the daily file that's 
> causing it. Whether this is similar to the safebrowsing issue (where the 
> ordering of entries in the file caused a 3000% increase in time) is unclear.
>  
> --Maarten Broekman
>  
> Full scans without the daily cvd/cld: Scan time ~60seconds
> Full scans with the daily from March 11th: Scan time: 84seconds
> Full scans with the daily from March 17th: Scan time: 109seconds
>  
> ~/clamav# ls -larth  /tmp/clamdtest*/daily.cld
> -rw-r--r-- 1 clamav clamav 110M Mar 11 04:15 /tmp/clamdtest2/daily.cld
> -rw-r--r-- 1 clamav clamav 113M Mar 17 04:15 /tmp/clamdtest/daily.cld
>  
> ~/clamav# wc /tmp/clamdtest*/daily.cld
>   1514589   1517471 115031552 /tmp/clamdtest2/daily.cld
>   1524782   1527664 118202368 /tmp/clamdtest/daily.cld
>  
> Single file scans with JUST the daily.cld:
> ~/clamav# time /opt/clamav/clamav/bin/clamscan -d /tmp/clamdtest2/daily.cld 
> test42.js
> test42.js: OK
>  
> ----------- SCAN SUMMARY -----------
> Known viruses: 1504423
> Engine version: 0.100.2
> Scanned directories: 1
> Scanned files: 1
> Infected files: 0
> Data scanned: 0.00 MB
> Data read: 0.00 MB (ratio 0.00:1)
> Time: 5.255 sec (0 m 5 s)
>  
> real    0m5.260s
> user    0m5.044s
> sys    0m0.192s
> ~/clamav# time /opt/clamav/clamav/bin/clamscan -d /tmp/clamdtest/daily.cld 
> test42.js
> test42.js: OK
>  
> ----------- SCAN SUMMARY -----------
> Known viruses: 1514543
> Engine version: 0.100.2
> Scanned directories: 1
> Scanned files: 1
> Infected files: 0
> Data scanned: 0.00 MB
> Data read: 0.00 MB (ratio 0.00:1)
> Time: 9.300 sec (0 m 9 s)
>  
> real    0m9.329s
> user    0m9.100s
> sys    0m0.204s
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 10:02 AM Yasuhiro KIMURA <y...@utahime.org 
> <mailto:y...@utahime.org>> wrote:
>> From: Jean-Michel via clamav-users <clamav-users@lists.clamav.net 
>> <mailto:clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>>
>> Subject: Re: [clamav-users] Scan very slow
>> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 12:30:49 +0100
>> 
>> > Isn't it the second scan result ? The second analyse on same file is 
>> > faster.
>> > Could tou try to restart clamav-daemon and re-do the analyse with 
>> > clamdscan.
>> > I've tried it on 3 computers, all are above 40seconds
>> 
>> It was first trial. But after restarting clamav-daemon result changed
>> as following.
>> 
>> yasu@kusanagi[1716]% clamdscan esploso_A3TH.pdf
>> /home/yasu/tmp/esploso_A3TH.pdf: OK
>> 
>> ----------- SCAN SUMMARY -----------
>> Infected files: 0
>> Time: 60.551 sec (1 m 0 s)
>> yasu@kusanagi[1717]%
>> 
>> ---
>> Yasuhiro KIMURA
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> 
>> clamav-users mailing list
>> clamav-users@lists.clamav.net <mailto:clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>
>> https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users 
>> <https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users>
>> 
>> 
>> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
>> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq 
>> <https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq>
>> 
>> http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml <http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml>
> _______________________________________________
> 
> clamav-users mailing list
> clamav-users@lists.clamav.net <mailto:clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>
> https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users 
> <https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users>
> 
> 
> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq 
> <https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq>
> 
> http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml <http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________

clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users


Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq

http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml

Reply via email to