I'm not sure why you are trying to characterize performance overhead as "issues". Every process running on a server has some resource requirements. I am. Performance engineer and my focus is in getting the most out of every infrastructure server. Hence my question about overhead. In this case we are planning to implement on RHEL and Solaris servers. If you don't have any useful info, then please don't waste my time. Thanks very much, Len
---- Yuri <yvoi...@gmail.com> wrote: > If I complain about overhead/performance issue, I should: > > -Specify hardware/infrastructure details > > -Usage of system (some specific) > > - Root case (For example "I test 4 Gb-size ISO images and I has CPU > overhead") > > WIthout this it is only blah-blah-blah. > > For example: In my case, I have 2 socket (4 cores each) Xeon 2.4 GHz CPU > + 16 Gb RAM hardware, using ClamAV under Solaris 10 for real-time web > traffic scanning. And in my configuration I have no overhead/performance > issues. > > > 17.03.2018 04:59, Yuri пишет: > > So, what? > > > > Real-life experience is useless without full > > infrastructure/configuration comparison. > > > > So, you not focused on real performance issues in this context, just > > bla-bla-bla. What overhead? On what tasks? On what infrastructure/hardware? > > > > What else I miss? > > > > > > 17.03.2018 02:48, Len Sanschargrin пишет: > >> The need is not about issues, or comparisons, it's about real-life > >> experiences with the product and the overhead observed. Of course we'll do > >> our own testing but the earlier we know, the better. We also know some > >> features will cost more in terms of overhead than others, so I'm looking > >> for real experiences around which features are more expensive, etc.. > >> > >> Thanks very much, Len > >> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: clamav-users [mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On > >> Behalf Of Yuri > >> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 4:38 PM > >> To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net > >> Subject: Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV performance overhead on RHEL & Solaris > >> > >> What are you looking for? Performance complains? There is not. > >> > >> https://i.imgur.com/3Likl14.png > >> > >> ClamAV runs on this server and it's ok. > >> > >> Built from sources. > >> > >> 17.03.2018 02:34, Len Sanschargrin пишет: > >>> Any relative numbers you can share? > >>> > >>> Thanks very much, Len Sanschargrin > >>> > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: clamav-users [mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On > >>> Behalf Of SCOTT PACKARD > >>> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 3:47 PM > >>> To: ClamAV users ML > >>> Subject: Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV performance overhead on RHEL & > >>> Solaris > >>> > >>> It plays on RHEL and Solaris a lot better than Symantec. > >>> You should get your Solaris builds from www.unixpackages.com. > >>> > >>> Regards, Scott > >>> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: clamav-users [mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On > >>>> Behalf Of Len Sanschargrin > >>>> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 10:45 AM > >>>> To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net > >>>> Subject: [External] [clamav-users] ClamAV performance overhead on > >>>> RHEL & Solaris > >>>> > >>>> Hello, I have customer who is preparing to implement ClamAV on RHEL > >>>> and Solaris. As the Performance engineer, I'm looking for any testing > >>>> or stats on potential overhead can be associated with running ClamAV. > >>>> Even just anecdotal observations can help us to set expectations and > >>>> of course any additional guidance is appreciated! > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Thanks very much, Len > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> clamav-users mailing list > >>>> clamav-users@lists.clamav.net > >>>> http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: > >>>> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq > >>>> > >>>> http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> clamav-users mailing list > >>> clamav-users@lists.clamav.net > >>> http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users > >>> > >>> > >>> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: > >>> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq > >>> > >>> http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> clamav-users mailing list > >>> clamav-users@lists.clamav.net > >>> http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users > >>> > >>> > >>> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: > >>> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq > >>> > >>> http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml > >> -- > >> "C++ seems like a language suitable for firing other people's legs." > >> > >> ***************************** > >> * C++20 : Bug to the future * > >> ***************************** > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> clamav-users mailing list > >> clamav-users@lists.clamav.net > >> http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users > >> > >> > >> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: > >> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq > >> > >> http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml > > -- > "C++ seems like a language suitable for firing other people's legs." > > ***************************** > * C++20 : Bug to the future * > ***************************** > > _______________________________________________ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.clamav.net http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
