If I complain about overhead/performance issue, I should:

-Specify hardware/infrastructure details

-Usage of system (some specific)

- Root case (For example "I test 4 Gb-size ISO images and I has CPU
overhead")

WIthout this it is only blah-blah-blah.

For example: In my case, I have 2 socket (4 cores each) Xeon 2.4 GHz CPU
+ 16 Gb RAM hardware, using ClamAV under Solaris 10 for real-time web
traffic scanning. And in my configuration I have no overhead/performance
issues.


17.03.2018 04:59, Yuri пишет:
> So, what?
>
> Real-life experience is useless without full
> infrastructure/configuration comparison.
>
> So, you not focused on real performance issues in this context, just
> bla-bla-bla. What overhead? On what tasks? On what infrastructure/hardware?
>
> What else I miss?
>
>
> 17.03.2018 02:48, Len Sanschargrin пишет:
>> The need is not about issues, or comparisons, it's about real-life 
>> experiences with the product and the overhead observed. Of course we'll do 
>> our own testing but the earlier we know, the better. We also know some 
>> features will cost more in terms of overhead than others, so I'm looking for 
>> real experiences around which features are more expensive, etc.. 
>>
>> Thanks very much, Len
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: clamav-users [mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf 
>> Of Yuri
>> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 4:38 PM
>> To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
>> Subject: Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV performance overhead on RHEL & Solaris
>>
>> What are you looking for? Performance complains? There is not.
>>
>> https://i.imgur.com/3Likl14.png
>>
>> ClamAV runs on this server and it's ok.
>>
>> Built from sources.
>>
>> 17.03.2018 02:34, Len Sanschargrin пишет:
>>> Any relative numbers you can share?
>>>
>>> Thanks very much, Len Sanschargrin
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: clamav-users [mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On 
>>> Behalf Of SCOTT PACKARD
>>> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 3:47 PM
>>> To: ClamAV users ML
>>> Subject: Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV performance overhead on RHEL & 
>>> Solaris
>>>
>>> It plays on RHEL and Solaris a lot better than Symantec.
>>> You should get your Solaris builds from www.unixpackages.com.
>>>
>>> Regards, Scott
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: clamav-users [mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On 
>>>> Behalf Of Len Sanschargrin
>>>> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 10:45 AM
>>>> To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
>>>> Subject: [External] [clamav-users] ClamAV performance overhead on 
>>>> RHEL & Solaris
>>>>
>>>> Hello, I have customer who is preparing to implement ClamAV on RHEL 
>>>> and Solaris. As the Performance engineer, I'm looking for any testing 
>>>> or stats on potential overhead can be associated with running ClamAV.
>>>> Even just anecdotal observations can help us to set expectations and 
>>>> of course any additional guidance is appreciated!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks very much, Len
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> clamav-users mailing list
>>>> clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
>>>> http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
>>>> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
>>>>
>>>> http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> clamav-users mailing list
>>> clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
>>> http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
>>>
>>>
>>> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
>>> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
>>>
>>> http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> clamav-users mailing list
>>> clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
>>> http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
>>>
>>>
>>> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
>>> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
>>>
>>> http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
>> --
>> "C++ seems like a language suitable for firing other people's legs."
>>
>> *****************************
>> * C++20 : Bug to the future *
>> *****************************
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> clamav-users mailing list
>> clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
>> http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
>>
>>
>> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
>> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
>>
>> http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml

-- 
"C++ seems like a language suitable for firing other people's legs."

*****************************
* C++20 : Bug to the future *
*****************************


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users


Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq

http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml

Reply via email to