Wow guys I can't imagine I would have induced such a debate! :) Il 22/gen/2017 00:27, "Joel Esler (jesler)" <jes...@cisco.com> ha scritto:
> This open source, free, project is made up of its community. While we > provide most of the detection and underlying systems that support the > project and community, the ton of community based signatures we ingest and > publish are the real help. > > Obviously you are unhappy and have been unhappy with the state of the > project for some time. Every email you've recently written has just been > mean spirited and not adding to detection or helping people participate in > the project. Consistently being negative without advancing the state of > the project is not constructive. > > Please understand that we all want a constructive community and largely > it's made up of people like that. But the amount of offlist email I > receive about your communication makes it quite obvious that I am not the > only one who realizes you are unhappy here. > > Please participate in a positive manner with providing detection to > others, helping others with their installs, helping with development, etc. > This is a free project, so I can't offer you a refund. > > -- > Sent from my iPhone > > On Jan 21, 2017, at 4:55 PM, Groach <groachmail-stopspammin...@yahoo.com > <mailto:groachmail-stopspammin...@yahoo.com>> wrote: > > On 21/01/2017 18:44, Joel Esler (jesler) wrote: > If you are so unhappy, why are you on the list? > > Please remain constructive and help out the community. > > -- > Sent from my iPhone > > He asked: > > " I just wanted to ask you whether I can be sure, or should worry; .... I > would like to be sure that that was actually a false positive (or in which > percentage it might be)." > > And I answered him with my opinion: > > (Of his original file recently now being detected): > > 1, It was a windows installation CD > 2, Its a file nearly 20 years old > 3, Clam signatures couldnt detect water in an ocean. (I would be very > surprised if it ever detects a real threat for you). > > > All reasonable and FACTUAL for a determination to conclude that he would > be safe. That means CONSTRUCTIVE in my view. At what point does it say I > am unhappy? I am VERY happy with Clam with my additional use of effective > 3rd party signatures (Sane Security). > > Why remain on the list? > > To be HELPful. if I can giving people the opportunity of decisions based > on other people's (my) opinions and experiences so that that may come to > conclusion of their own once weighing up everything that they are advised, > then I will. After all, isnt that what a PUBLIC mailing list where people > ask questions and advice to the public is about? > > Why waste your time asking me these things and soiling the thread with > irrelevant nonsense? Evidently you dont like some of the disparaging > things I say about the effectiveness of ClamAv signatures - so do something > about the (ineffective) quality of the poor signatures and not about the > people (plural!) mentioning it. > _______________________________________________ > clamav-users mailing list > clamav-users@lists.clamav.net<mailto:clamav-users@lists.clamav.net> > http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users > > > Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: > https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq > > http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml > _______________________________________________ > clamav-users mailing list > clamav-users@lists.clamav.net > http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users > > > Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: > https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq > > http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml > _______________________________________________ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.clamav.net http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
