On 10/4/10 6:52 PM, "Dennis Peterson" <denni...@inetnw.com> wrote:
> On 10/4/10 6:25 PM, Al Varnell wrote: > >> otool gives me identical results >> Sorry, I guess I should have said it's identical to yours: Load command 9 cmd LC_LOAD_DYLIB cmdsize 52 name /usr/lib/libbz2.1.0.dylib (offset 24) time stamp 2 Wed Dec 31 16:00:02 1969 current version 1.0.5 compatibility version 1.0.0 >> I've got a PPC so I'm still at Leopard 10.5.8. >> >> $ ls -l *bz2* >> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 282048 Nov 11 2008 libbz2.1.0.4.dylib >> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 282048 Jun 17 2009 libbz2.1.0.5.dylib >> lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 18 Apr 4 2010 libbz2.1.0.dylib -> >> libbz2.1.0.5.dylib >> lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 18 Apr 4 2010 libbz2.dylib -> >> libbz2.1.0.5.dylib >> >> Could it be that clamd was somehow compiled with 1.0.2? > > It appears that your library is 1.0.2 regardless of what the binary might be. > Did you ever do a restore of you /lib? That's most frequently how libs get > mysteriously backleveled. Assuming it was ever upgraded to 1.0.5. > So again, how come clamd says it loads 1.0.2 Load command 13 cmd LC_LOAD_DYLIB cmdsize 52 name /usr/lib/libbz2.1.0.dylib (offset 24) time stamp 2 Wed Dec 31 16:00:02 1969 current version 1.0.2 compatibility version 1.0.0 while bzip2 loads 1.0.5? -Al- -- Al Varnell Mountain View, CA _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml