On 4/21/10 05:38 , Jim Preston wrote: > Steve Wray wrote: >> I am not a lawyer but I do think that this is something that the >> authorities might possibly examine. >> >> I do think that pushing out an update which disables functionality >> without explicitly requesting permission to make such a change >> *before* making that change *should* be criminal. >> >> Ie: without someone on the server which is about to have a service >> stopped having to at least press the 'y' key on their keyboard, for >> example. >> >> This kind of thing really is extremely arrogant, I can see no other >> way to put it. Sorry if that offends. >> > PS: They did explicitly request permission by allowing users to > comment on their proposed changes for 6 months. Where were your > objections during that time? > > Jim > _______________________________________________ > Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net > http://www.clamav.net/support/ml > I always chuckle when "aggressors" shoot themselves in the foot like that... Shows they've not actually READ the threads, and just jump on their high horses like righteous knights... I was itching to type that reply, but - more like a just knight than a righteous knight <G> - first read the rest of the posts... Thank you for doing it, so I don't "have" to get in to the discussion again...
--FP Thinking it's always good to realize there's people standing behind you _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
