Steve Wray wrote:
I am not a lawyer but I do think that this is something that the
authorities might possibly examine.
I do think that pushing out an update which disables functionality
without explicitly requesting permission to make such a change
*before* making that change *should* be criminal.
Ie: without someone on the server which is about to have a service
stopped having to at least press the 'y' key on their keyboard, for
example.
This kind of thing really is extremely arrogant, I can see no other
way to put it. Sorry if that offends.
PS: They did explicitly request permission by allowing users to comment
on their proposed changes for 6 months. Where were your objections
during that time?
Jim
_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
