[email protected] wrote: >> If you were properly scanning your own outgoing mail you would have seen >> this problem before the message left your system. That is another policy >> issue. I understand this is a contentious issue with some people but I'll >> never understand why. For me is it simply a best practice activity. > > Um, that's why I started asking about it, because I DID see it in my outgoing > monitoring.
Good - unfortunately the message blamed the remote host and it wasn't obvious that remote host was your host. My apologies for misrepresenting your excellent policy of scanning outgoing messages. > > Why does there always have to be any sort of blame? It's not something I had > seen before, I asked about it, I figured it out as not being a problem. > Better to ask than not sometimes, one never knows when there is something new > out there. > There was no blame. I was taking advantage of your problem statement by making an extended point about policy based on your example as it was presented. I did say this was controversial :) dp _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
