On 2009-02-15 10:51, Steve wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 10:30:22 +0200
> Török Edwin <edwinto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>   
>> On 2009-02-15 07:15, Steve wrote:
>>     
>>> My main frustration is that the only way I can get more information from 
>>> the applications is to rewrite the
>>>  code itself... at least it's written in a real language (runs for cover!). 
>>> but it would be great to be able to change the log level to get more 
>>> detailed info out. Then I would be able to take a more proactive approach 
>>> in debugging this problem.
>>>   
>>>       
>> Enable LogVerbose in clamd.conf, currently it will show lot of debugging
>> messages about the protocol
>> (I'll change this before the RC, so it won't output debug messages,
>> unless you also specify Debug yes. But for now, enabling LogVerbose in
>> clamd.conf should give plenty of
>> protocol messages. At least one can see if clamd actually received a
>> command from the milter).
>>
>> Another thing you may try is to use 'tcp:localhost:3310' in
>> clamav-milter.conf, instead of the unix socket, and see if that makes
>> any difference.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> --Edwin
>> _______________________________________________
>> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
>> http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
>>     
> Will do. It'll be about 12 hours or so before I try it... timezones and all 
> that.
>
> Can I use logverbose on the milter as well??

Yes, it should show if the connection to clamd is alive/dead.

Best regards,
--Edwin
_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml

Reply via email to