On Nov 20, 2007 4:20 PM, tBB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David F. Skoll wrote:
>
> > Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> >
> >> This is getting boring!
> >
> > I'm sorry you find it so. I actually find this to be exciting reading:
> >
> > http://www.securityfocus.com/cgi-bin/index.cgi?o=0&l=30&c=12&op=display_list&vendor=Clam%20Anti-Virus&version=&title=&CVE=
>
> Oh, then I'm sure you will find this an interesting reading too:
>
> http://search.securityfocus.com/swsearch?sbm=%2F&metaname=alldoc&query=roaring+penguin+software+vulnerabil%2A&x=0&y=0
Five vulnerabilities of which only 3 are for MIMEDefang, one this
year, one in 2004 and one in 2002 compared to the 2 pages of hits for
Clam - I don't think that was the comparison you were hoping for ;)
Either way, yes, like every product there are vulnerabilities in both.
David's original comment about ClamAV's vulnerability history doesn't
appear too far from the mark, regardless of the obviously high
emotions on either "side".
--
Please keep list traffic on the list.
Rob MacGregor
Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he
doesn't become a monster. Friedrich Nietzsche
_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
