On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 07:42:27 -0500 "David F. Skoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It wouldn't surprise me. Clam has a rather checkered security history, > and some of its code is pretty convoluted. This is getting boring! -- oo ..... Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (\/)\......... http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg/tkojm.gpg \..........._ 0DCA5A08407D5288279DB43454822DC8985A444B //\ /\ Tue Nov 20 14:10:06 CET 2007 _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html