On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 07:42:27 -0500
"David F. Skoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> It wouldn't surprise me.  Clam has a rather checkered security history,
> and some of its code is pretty convoluted.

This is getting boring!

-- 
   oo    .....         Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  (\/)\.........         http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg/tkojm.gpg
     \..........._         0DCA5A08407D5288279DB43454822DC8985A444B
       //\   /\              Tue Nov 20 14:10:06 CET 2007
_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Reply via email to