[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/20/2007 06:29:50 AM:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] in message 'Re: [Clamav-users] I need to > refute a 'security expert'' wrote: > > > > > > I wouldn't even be in this situation, except that Symantec AV for > Linux is a little too fussy about kernel levels and the like to pass muster. > > > > We're builing a fairly massive vignette/orcale/apache et al > environment and the Symantec product is kernel level rigid. It's > like we will support > > 2.4.16-252. Not 251. Not 253 JUST 251. So we apply maintenance > that involves the kernal, which we did for some oracle/vignette > level set requirements > > and SAV stopped doing on access scanning and all the other stuff > we wanted it for. Just because the kernel level nudged up slightly. > > > > So I dusted off my Clam AV setup that I built for Linux on > z/Series, created a front end, and through some NFS magic, and > automount, I scan all the > > linux server file systems from a single point, and let ONE server > do all the heavy lifting. > > > > Is it perfect? no. Is it working? Yes. > > > > IMHO this and some other posts in this thread > qualify as http://wiki.clamav.net/Main/SuccessStories > > Have you considered, adding it there? :) I have a strict personal policy of not doing anything that even remotely looks like self referential promotion. While I don't have a problem with someone posting something like that, getting thye facts from me etc, I will not do it myself. I don't like the visibility. -J > > cheers, Michał Spadliński > -- > main(int a[puts("Michal 'GiM' Spadlinski")]){} > _______________________________________________ > Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net > http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
