[EMAIL PROTECTED] in message 'Re: [Clamav-users] I need to refute a 'security expert'' wrote: > > > I wouldn't even be in this situation, except that Symantec AV for Linux is a > little too fussy about kernel levels and the like to pass muster. > > We're builing a fairly massive vignette/orcale/apache et al environment and > the Symantec product is kernel level rigid. It's like we will support > 2.4.16-252. Not 251. Not 253 JUST 251. So we apply maintenance that involves > the kernal, which we did for some oracle/vignette level set requirements > and SAV stopped doing on access scanning and all the other stuff we wanted it > for. Just because the kernel level nudged up slightly. > > So I dusted off my Clam AV setup that I built for Linux on z/Series, created > a front end, and through some NFS magic, and automount, I scan all the > linux server file systems from a single point, and let ONE server do all the > heavy lifting. > > Is it perfect? no. Is it working? Yes. >
IMHO this and some other posts in this thread qualify as http://wiki.clamav.net/Main/SuccessStories Have you considered, adding it there? :) cheers, Michał Spadliński -- main(int a[puts("Michal 'GiM' Spadlinski")]){} _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
