Bart Silverstrim wrote: > If he already did and hadn't gotten feedback, maybe there could be some > people who would coordinate some form of feedback system on whether a > sample is in the works or in the queue or something like that or an > automated sig-maker system could be worked on as a project. If the > things he is asking be included in the malware detection code isn't > going to do it because the developers have vetoed it, then tell him.
Give people blood, and they will still find some reason to complain. > Don't just insult the guy. Geez. :-( Courtesy first, I do have to agree with you on that. Pandering, however, is a very different thing. Matt _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
