Matt Fretwell said: > Dennis Peterson wrote: > >> There is no need to block outright from the outset. > >> As I mentioned earlier, I'm getting slammed from comcast.net from relays >> all over the US. It is far easier to block by obvious dsl/cable host >> identifiers than to spend hours trying to figure out what /24 IP ranges >> to tweek. I see the problem as comcasts, not mine. Your milage may vary >> - I know mine did. > > > The point with the above is different. Comcast had the initial, with you, > opportunity and made a mess of it. With that level of abuse, if its > related to their network in any way or form, it would be blocked. Even I > wouldn't bother with a /24 block for that level of abuse. By that point, I > would merrily block their entire network, rhsbl and rbl, without giving it > a second thought. > > There is no need to blanket ban every other providers dsl yet, though :)
I'm just getting over a heart attack - I don't have time to play around with these bastids. Time's become way too important to be playing around with class C address space - I'm taking out whole nations now :-) dp _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
