On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, [ISO-8859-2] Bogusław Brandys wrote:
; -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
; Hash: SHA1
;
; Nigel Horne wrote:
; > On Wednesday 16 Feb 2005 14:18, Ted Fines wrote:
; >
; >
; >>FOUR MINUTES, 13 SECONDS for an 800k email.
...
; > 0.80 didn't scan it properly and would have let a virus through, 0.83 fixes
that bug.
; Oversized.Mail ? Do we need such new detection or is better solution ?
How about MailMaxMimeDepth and MailBlockMax directives ? Most other
scanners I've used default to block any message with over 10 levels of
mime nesting, maybe something like 25 is a good default though.
Andy
_______________________________________________
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
