On Tuesday 26 October 2004 18:47, Jim Maul shaped the electrons to say: > Scott Ryan wrote: > > <SNIP> > > > What are we arguing about here? I just know in my experience that you are > > seriously shooting yourself in the foot by using clamscan to scan all > > mails. Trog's suggestion of modifying qmail-scanner (if you really want > > to create the link) sounds like the sensible solution to those who use > > QMR. > > Im simply arguing the fact that someone has spent a lot of their time to > help out the community by creating the QMR setup instructions
I dont think that anyone doubts that. As has been mentioned in the thread, documentation is the hardest part of any installation / build process. > and > because of some points made in that install this person is being accused > of being ignorant, stupid and breaking code. Again, I dont think that anyone thinks that the Author is 'stupid', just that the benefits of using clamdscan over clamscan is in orders of magnitude more beneficial. By suggesting to users to replace it is not wise, thats all. If you are in contact with the author maybe it is worth suggesting to him to make the change. > > Thats just flat out wrong. > > -Jim > _______________________________________________ > http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users -- +----------------------------------------------+ (0> Scott Ryan //\ Senior Unix/Linux Engineer V_/_ Telkom Internet - South Africa +----------------------------------------------+ He who controls the past, controls the future, He who controls the present, controls the past. - George Orwell, 1984 ================================================ _______________________________________________ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
