On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 20:07:20 +0800 James Lick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It wouldn't be necessary to make clamscan and clamdscan the same > program > in this case. One could have clamscan check to see if it was invoked > as > clamdscan and if so refuse to run. Yes, it should be up to the end > user > to not screw up his own system, but this one issue has caused enough > grief here that such screw ups deserve a bit more direct effect. I > think it is entirely reasonable to have clamscan not work if it is > called clamdscan. I disagree. The source of the confusion must be fixed and not the victim. -- oo ..... Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (\/)\......... http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg/tkojm.gpg \..........._ 0DCA5A08407D5288279DB43454822DC8985A444B //\ /\ Wed Oct 27 14:21:06 CEST 2004
pgpfjFhw9DIkI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
