> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:clamav-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tomasz Kojm
> Sent: September 25, 2004 12:22
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Re: Re: Re: Windows port ?
> 
> On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 00:09:22 -0700
> "Mitch (WebCob)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > containing all their proprietary stuff, and write application B, which
> > calls product A or uses it's libs, but IS open sourced and GPL'd -
> 
> They can always use clamd (via its socket) without writing any
> additional stuff.
> 

[Mitch]

I totally agree - except that to do that they have to install cygwin on
windows, etc...

I think that's what would have started this whole thing - still could be
usable that way, though when everything is wrapped in cygwin calls and
service emulators (to encapsulate daemon functionality) things can get
ugly... he probably started thinking he was simplifying those problems
without realizing the size of the ensuing discussion that would follow.

Realizing and acknowledging that clam was written focusing on unix in
general, mail scanners in particular, I wonder if the clam team would be
interested in accepting windows ports of the code... assuming it's doable,
and I'm not volunteering. It would just open the product to an even wider
audience... of course maybe that's not desirable yet ;-) (considering mirror
server loads etc.!)

m/




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
_______________________________________________
Clamav-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users

Reply via email to