On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Damian Menscher wrote: > On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Richard A Nelson wrote: > > > > Yes, I guess one cant legislate sanity, can one :( > > But spamassassin and clamav should default to tempfail ! > > > > ...still cant believe that > > people aren't recommending a safe, by default setup. > > We are. ;) For most mailserver admins, the danger of losing our jobs > is much greater if we tempfail all incoming mail due to a clamav crash > than is the danger of losing our jobs due to a couple of viruses leaking > through. Where email is concerned, message delivery is critical. > Virus and spam filtering are features.
Ah, what's the problem with tempfail ? This isn't a 5xx rejection - the mail will be retried (unless of course, your milter is down longer than the remote hosts retry interval*tries)... -- Rick Nelson Life'll kill ya -- Warren Zevon Then you'll be dead -- Life'll kill ya ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
