Am Friday 13 August 2004 22:05 schrieb Damian Menscher:

Hi,

> other ideas.  But still, checking DNS for an update means a single UDP
> packet each way (which might even get cached). 

In the propose use case the DNS info is most probably cached by the next ISP 
already.

> Downloading the first 
> 512 bytes requires something like:
>
> SYN
> SYN-ACK
> ACK
> PUSH (request for data)
> ACK (response with data)
> FIN
> FIN-ACK
> ACK
>
> Plus, the server needs to handle the stateful connection.
> Seems a lot worse when you look at it this way.  ;)

It uses at least 3 orders of magnitude more resources and of course does also 
not scale that well.

Regards,
-- martin

Dipl.-Phys. Martin Konold

e r f r a k o n
Erlewein, Frank, Konold & Partner - Beratende Ingenieure und Physiker
Nobelstrasse 15, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
fon: 0711 67400963, fax: 0711 67400959
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
_______________________________________________
Clamav-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users

Reply via email to