On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 03:53:20PM -0700, Brock Nanson said:
> I've got a server running a Discus forum in addition to Exim4, Clamav 
> and spamassassin.  One of the functions of the forum is to send the 
> latest posting to all on the mail list.  The result is a flood of mail 
> that Exim sends on to Clam and Spamassassin.
> 
> Prior to adding Clam and SpamAssassin to the system, the discus mail 
> flowed without a hitch.  Now, however, I seem to be hitting a bottle 
> neck with one or the other of the new additions (Exim winds up running 
> 20 or more times and turning away mail - 'too many connections').  I'm 
> wondering it has to do with the number of consecutive connections 
> allowed by the clamav conf file.  If this is the case, I don't think the 
> solution is to increase the number to something exceeding the number of 
> mail list members...  ;-)
> 
> The logs are sort of chicken-egg.  It's not apparent where the problem 
> starts, so I don't know what sort of 'relevant' configuration data to 
> post.  Hence, I'm really just asking if mass mailings like this *could* 
> be an issue for Clamav, or if I should look elsewhere.

It sounds like for some reason you're running clam and SA against the
outgoing mail, instead of incoming.  Presumably when a message comes in,
it's one message for 1000 recipients (or whatever), and then gets mailed
off.  Scanning just that one message would be a lot more efficient.  If
the message board actually sends 1000 emails individually, maybe that's
what needs to be hacked on.
-- 
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  Stephen Gran                  | How do you power off this machine?  --  |
|  [EMAIL PROTECTED]             | Linus, when upgrading                   |
|  http://www.lobefin.net/~steve | linux.cs.helsinki.fi, and after using   |
|                                | the machine for several months          |
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment: pgpg6QehNrlwS.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to