Bert Koelewijn wrote:
Wow, I've been following this list for a week now and I'm amazed how nice you are to people who want to be spoon-fed.I am really annoyed. Besides the fact that I have learned by my self all that I know and I am responding regularly to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to users that are in linux just like I am in clamav (to wich list by the way I haven't seen you posting any answers although you sound just like the good samaritean) I have read the clamdoc.pdf and the documentation lacks a good overview of the way the engine works. Second: I am (in fact was) really hurried up by the fact that I want to buy for my organization a av solution for the M$ side (because I have all users and 2 servers on Win2k) and the firms that I have contacted bundled also a linux version of the av. Plus I have 80 stations with all kind of peripherics that all wait for me to pay a little attention so I thought that maybe someone could explain me like I have explained for others - and pay a little attention now - not spoon-feeding them just putting them on the right track. It's not like I asked what are the commands that will put my clam online and working. Third: if you hate my post so much I think the clever thing to do would have been to just delete it and save your reply time and also saving my mental sanity and a day that begun with reading your ... little post. Me for example I couldn't be able to read all posts on the other list so questions like "My X Server doesn't work" and things like that I simply delete them and let other people with much more time and much more experience in X to deal with them. Fourth: I think you missed the ideea of why mailing lists were invented in the first place. Fifth: looking from 1 to 4 I believe I spent too much time showing you things that are "heavier" in comparison to my first question wich you didn't even bother to respond. The things I was showing you regarded humanity and plain-simple courtesy. I will simply delete other postings from you in the following time. So to everyone else but Bert Koelewijn I am sorry if my novicism in clam has bothered you but I would like to read something about a complete solution and I'd like for someone to pinpoint me in the right direction. I am looking for something like NAV Auto-protect, I need to know how to make clam automatically scan incoming and outgoing mail and delete the mail containing infected items. BTW I have installed clam, libclam and clamd. To Jeff Smelser: The problem was really with clamuko wich supposably runs hooked with clamd and scans every file (on the various options) that is accessed or created in the <clamukoincludepath> but it doesn't. Maybe here I am right ... :). The way the engine works is a little too complicated for what a antivirus is intended to do. >From what I understand from http://qmail-scanner.sourceforge.net I see that although a clam process is active I need another software for qmail that will will actually scan the mailboxes. I use postfix for MTA and imap for pop3 and imap server. On clamav.net page I could read: on-access scanning (Linux and FreeBSD) and built-in support for Mbox, Maildir and raw mail files according to this I could get ONLY from clam the solution for scanning and deleting infected mails. Maybe someone from here could tell me why not? Yeah, right.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X. >From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the one installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504 _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users |
- [Clamav-users] clamd doesn't work Crucificator
- Re: [Clamav-users] clamd doesn't work Jakub Jankowski
- Re: [Clamav-users] clamd doesn't work Crucificator
- Re: [Clamav-users] clamd doesn't work Jeff Smelser
- Re: [Clamav-users] clamd doesn't work Jakub Jankowski
- RE: [Clamav-users] clamd doesn't work Michael Varre
- Re: [Clamav-users] clamd doesn't work Robert Blayzor
- Re: [Clamav-users] clamd doesn't work Bert Koelewijn
- Re: [Clamav-users] clamd doesn't work Crucificator
- Re: [Clamav-users] clamd doesn't wo... Bert Koelewijn
- Re: [Clamav-users] clamd doesn't wo... Jeremy Kitchen
- Re: [Clamav-users] clamd doesn't work Crucificator
- RE: [Clamav-users] clamd doesn't work Matthew . van . Eerde
- RE: [Clamav-users] clamd doesn't work Michael St. Laurent