On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Niek wrote:

> > Version 0.67 detects the virus correctly, 0.70 doesn't. Comparing the
> > amount of known virus, there is a difference of about 75 viruses. Needless
> > to say that I updated the signatures several times using freshclam, which
> > was successfull (no error messages) but the diff between the installations
> > keeps as it is.
>
> If you use clamd, it can take up to one hour before clamd selfchecks itself,
> and rereads the definition files. Selfcheck can be set in clamav.conf.

thanks for this information, but I use the possibility to notify clamd
about the update. And I also tried using clamscan. Both does not change
anything.

Regards,

Andreas Haase
Postmaster
EastLink GmbH
-- 
-------------- professional INTERNET services -------------

EastLink GmbH  -  Leipziger Strasse 46  -  D-09113 Chemnitz
voice: +49-180-5432060 fax: +49-371-4320626 www.eastlink.de


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
Clamav-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users

Reply via email to