Colin A. Bartlett said: >> Another poster pointed to testvirus.org for testing. I think >> you'll >> find some methods of delivery more effective than others and that >> clamav will miss some of these. > > They're not being detected by clam even when running them right > through > clamscan on the command prompt. I think it's because SomeFool.P > isn't in my > sig list even though freshclam says I'm up to date. >
Well, it works for me. sigtool -i main.cvd reports: Build time: 29 Feb 2004 18-19 +0100 Version: 21 # of signatures: 20094 Functionality level: 1 Builder: tkojm MD5: a20b254aa5f6b97dcafc115a63c8af4e Digital signature: rpzUhP4jcYOSj/tMnkU5zPs3GbJWsdmj2+7Z4BkUGOfN8pS0XnQ2qJY1TF/1P4jeadvBVNoCwJiIwamnGtBO8fTnLiMgMXSiy/L1odsalY0iCyRmxzYNqWUoG6Q3CMhEJ8M9c8idT7LBGYHwtKCBv0hHhIIrkqS2jh5V0XAxIwh Digital signature support not compiled in. Verification OK. sigtool -i daily.cvd reports: Build time: 25 Mar 2004 15-10 +0100 Version: 215 # of signatures: 608 Functionality level: 1 Builder: diego MD5: ea131331b9006fe9139c0527b8a3ace2 Digital signature: jL35pyOXWpm+SrPz1SBpDgVHT72RCDcteU8JqM5C6wIcGR9dOXYBwcacE5ARzEKwtw4ElwCoSwFLVF8mfw8wVVtuN1Ll+EmAJXWf8nDPu69mv4xKE5Y1DNMAQYgZlvuXwQMEzNRjuyvAIyc5aR9d0aD0v8UrpYzNiHj49vDbOne Digital signature support not compiled in. Verification OK. And the log says: /var/spool/qmailscan/tmp/dinky.tclme.org10802154054707319/readme.pif: Worm.SomeFool.P FOUND -- Bob Greene ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
