Adam Webb wrote: > softlimit set to low?
Well, how much RAM does clamdscan eat then? Is it a flat memory footprint, or does it climb based on message size? I assumed that it would be a flat memory footprint and that clamdscan would simply write a large file to disk and pass it off to clamd. That's what I would do. :) > It's a release candidate, not a recognized stable > code. Just a thought. I'm aware of that. Besides this stress testing bug I haven't had any problems with it. The upgrade was well worth the risk for the new features. -- Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator WingNET Internet Services, P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605 423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f) http://www.wingnet.net ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
