-----Original Message----- From: Virgo Pärna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, 25. Feb 2004 3:01 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Clamav-users] Re: Multiple viruses in same file.
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 09:32:50 +0800, cc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But wouldn't that waste cpu cycles when it has already been confirmed > that the said file is infected? I mean, if say you were scanning your > Actually, my idea was to have switch to enable it.... Not to do it by default, but to have this ability for testing purposes. Like this CIH, that was detected as Swen.A by NAV. With full db scan clamav would have been able to show me (probably), that the file is CIH #2 and Gibe.F. I do agree, that it would be useless in real use in server. Which raises another question - if NAV and clamav detected virus differently, does this mean, that NAV virus database has newest viruses first while clamav has newest last? Isnt this an issue of AV programs calling viruses by different names and not actually a file infected with multiple viruses? ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
