On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 09:32:50 +0800, cc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> But wouldn't that waste cpu cycles when it has already been confirmed
> that the said file is infected? I mean, if say you were scanning your
>
Actually, my idea was to have switch to enable it.... Not to do
it by default, but to have this ability for testing purposes. Like
this CIH, that was detected as Swen.A by NAV. With full db scan clamav
would have been able to show me (probably), that the file is CIH #2
and Gibe.F. I do agree, that it would be useless in real use in
server. Which raises another question - if NAV and clamav detected
virus differently, does this mean, that NAV virus database has newest
viruses first while clamav has newest last?
--
Virgo Pärna
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
_______________________________________________
Clamav-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
