On Sunday 01 February 2004 12:35 pm, Tomasz Kojm wrote: > On Sun, 1 Feb 2004 07:15:50 -0800 > > Matthew Trent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > (sent with the wrong From the first time) > > > > On Sunday 01 February 2004 12:44 am, Tomasz Kojm wrote: > > > Are you running clamav-milter ? Do you have enabled ScanMail in > > > clamav.conf ? > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Tomasz Kojm > > > > No milter; I'm running Exim+Exiscan, and ScanMail is enabled. > > You don't need ScanMail with exiscan. > > Best regards, > Tomasz Kojm
I imagine things like the new bounce-catching code would be dependent on ScanMail, is that correct? In that case Exiscan wouldn't do it all and ScanMail should still be on. If not, is there really no reason at all to have ScanMail on? The memory leak thing seems to affect more than just the Exiscan + ScanMail combo, though (as reported by the other people). -- Matt ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
