Hasn't there been problems with the stability of clamd for a long time? Are those problems solved now?

I use MailScanner and it sends batches of files to scan so the speed difference is negligible and I don't have to worry about if clamd has stopped. Anyway, I find that it takes more time for SpamAssassin to check a message than it takes to virus scan it.

/Peter Bonivart

--Unix lovers do it in the Sun

Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.25-14,
SpamAssassin 2.61 + DCC 1.2.21, ClamAV 0.65 + GMP

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks for your reply - and to the others who posted in this thread as well. i have a much better understanding now of all this. and it sure is great to no longer be faced with throwing even more iron at the problem!


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
_______________________________________________
Clamav-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users

Reply via email to