On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Odhiambo Washington wrote:

> Hello people,
>
> Okay, this is precursor to April fools day! Forgive me if I went overboard,
> but I have a question or two about the impending -stable release.
> After all the issued reported by Ed Phillips, do we still expect the release
> out as earlier planned?
> My answer would be NO. Why? Because I believe Tomasz has a life also and we
> should give him more time to look at the issues raised, so that the upcoming
> release would be "real" stable.
>
> Tomasz, please push the date ahead officially.

I agree... it's been a long time since 0.60, and it doesn't really matter
if we have another handful of snapshots in an attempt to weed out the
lingering problems.  20030317 was wonderfully stable for us (clamd scanned
easily 50 million emails for us over the course of 3+ months without
crashing or exiting).  Until this rash of viruses inside of broken emails,
we haven't needed to "upgrade".  I'm sorry to suddenly show up with a raft
of problem reports, but it will likely make ClamAV better on
Sun/Solaris...

I'd still like to get the "gcc favoritism" stripped out, so we can use Sun
Forte to compile it, but that will take time... and we're very busy here,
so recompiling software for "fun" may not be feasible right now... ;-)

By they way, 20031104 made it through it's first night in production here
at UD...  <keeping fingers crossed>

        Ed

Ed Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> University of Delaware (302) 831-6082
Systems Programmer III, Network and Systems Services


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?   SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
Clamav-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users

Reply via email to