I agree 100%.

/Peter Bonivart

--Unix lovers do it in the Sun

On Mon, 2003-06-09 at 18:44, Stephen White wrote:
> I think you've just found a benefit.  I can't afford to run a commercial
> virus scanner on the mailing list server I run for a couploe of
> non-commercial reasons (eg for the benefit of my local Scout Group) ...
> however clamav should provide reasonable protection against members of
> the lists infecting each other via the messages to one of the lists.
> 
> I don't need to disinfect the messages, I just want to make a reasonable
> attempt to stop infected ones being delivered to the intended
> victims^Wrecipients.  The sender will see the bounce, disinfect their
> computer (with whatever anti-virus software they have, or purchase some
> if not) and send out a clean version themselves.  It's not my job to
> clean the attachments, in fact that's entirely counter productive
> because it removes one of the immediate reasons that the sender would
> have for disinfecting themselves - and if the email isn't disinfected
> properly it would shift some of the reponsibility for the distribution
> of the virus onto me.  I'm suspect that 90% of mailserver administrators 
> probably have similar objectives.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to