You should definitely use Matt Simerson's qmail multiple patch: http://matt.simerson.com/computing/mail/toaster/qmail-1.03-toaster-2.3.patch
It is actually just a well-prepared set of other patches, without modification. It includes: SMTP AUTH QMAILQUEUE STARTTLS for qmail and more... I am using qmail + the patch above + qmail-scanner + clamscan + SMTP autentication, works fine. Just have to test clamd + clamdscan instead of clamscan... Best Regards, Johan Kuuse ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tomasz Nidecki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomasz Kojm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 12:59 PM Subject: Re[2]: [clamav-users] Clamav and qmail - your experiences and opinions > Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 7:49:28 PM, Tomasz wrote: > > >> - not require a recompilation of qmail (would supply a qmail-queue > >> script which would call the scanner and then the original qmail-queue) > >> > >> - take little memory, be streamlined and fast. > > > qmail + qmail-scanner - modified to use clamdscan instead of clamscan > > should work fine. > > Thx, but qmail-scanner demands a recompilation of qmail with the > qmail-queue patch 8[... > > -- > tomasz 'tonid' nidecki, zoliborz, warszawa, poland > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://endemic.org > http://mp3.com/tonid http://mp3.com/knownspace > > * bortaS blr jablu'Dl'reH QaQqu'nay' > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
