On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:04:43 +0100
Gianluigi Tiesi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> There is a reason if we (clamwin) changed this, we still prefer to skip
> unknown files, and we don't need to care much about html and mail

You don't need to care about HTML?

> files, so I've made some tweaks (not only this one) to save some
> cpu cycles avoiding scan of unneeded files.

I wouldn't call it a tweak, I'd call it an error. Your change introduced much
more serious problems.

> I'm aware that for a mail server scanner it's not the correct approach,
> so in fact my post was only a "comment", it was never intended to
> be in clamav tree.
> A scan of a real pc hd can take ages, clamscan without any change
> scans large avi files in raw mode (there is only a specific check for
> anim riffs), other media files and e.g. iso files are also scanned in
> raw mode.
> 10-20gb of media/iso is not uncommon to find in a user pc, while
> they are very unlikely to be in a mail.

Still there are better ways to deal with big files than breaking important
parts of code.

-- 
   oo    .....         Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  (\/)\.........         http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg/tkojm.gpg
     \..........._         0DCA5A08407D5288279DB43454822DC8985A444B
       //\   /\              Wed Feb 28 19:14:03 CET 2007
_______________________________________________
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net

Reply via email to