On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:30:37 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > disadvantage decreasing this buffer to 25000? I guess it is only a > > > > > > performance and not a safety issue. [...] > I don't use the scanbuff funktion. I'm using cl_scandesc. I think I > have to explain the functionality of my proxy.
Sorry, before coffee I was reading mails between lines. You were correct in your guess, changing the value of SCANBUFF can only affect performance and not functionality. -- oo ..... Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (\/)\......... http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg/tkojm.gpg \..........._ 0DCA5A08407D5288279DB43454822DC8985A444B //\ /\ Tue Feb 22 13:43:28 CET 2005
pgplkotGG9bnl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
