[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/22/2005 08:05:51:
> Please do not use cl_scanbuff at all, it's to be removed in 0.90. This
> function only supports old type signature scanning and will miss many
> viruses (just try to scan test/clam.exe). You should definitely use
> cl_scanfile/cl_scandesc instead. Due to performance reasons you can
> suggest your users to use a memory based filesystem for proxy file
> operations (then also add some option to havp that will allow to set
> that directory in libclamav with cl_settempdir())
Too bad scanbuff is being retired. I really enjoy the idea of mem buffer scanning.
Is there any plan to improve and keep it or removal of it *is* a fact?
I haven't been following clamav development very close lately, so I don't understand why it only supports "old type signature". Is there an easy answer to that?
Neto.
_______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
