28.09.2020 15:20, [email protected] wrote: > > I would avoid using gig 0/3 and would not bundle it with gig0/[012] . > > Gig0/0 0/1 0/2 are marvel SOCs build-in Ports > while Gig0/3 together with the Mangement "Fas"0/0 are on a separate intel > ethernetcontrollerchip > (with gig+(only)fas they try tonot oversubscribe the internal pci bus )
We do not use FastEthernet0/0 at all (shut down), instead a console port is connected to a console server. I already run one of 7201 with a couple of 2x1G port-channels mostly for redundancy as it proccesses less than 100Mbps, no problems observed. Will see how it goes with more loaded box. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
